[Figure: FiveStudy logo]
FiveStudy
Calculus BC · Unit 10 · 10.1
AP Calculus BC · Infinite Sequences and Series
Defining Convergent and Divergent Infinite Series
A series is the limit of its partial sums — nothing is ever added infinitely many times.
key idea$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n=\lim_{N\to\infty}S_N,\qquad S_N=\sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$
What it says
Partial sum
\[S_N=a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_N\]
A finite sum: add the first $N$ terms and stop. Every partial sum is an ordinary number, and the sequence $S_1,S_2,S_3,\dots$ is what the whole subject is really about.
Convergent series
\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n=L\iff \lim_{N\to\infty}S_N=L\]
An infinite series converges when its sequence of partial sums approaches a finite limit. The sum of a series is therefore defined as a limit — nothing is ever added infinitely many times.
SequenceAn ordered list of numbers $a_1,a_2,\dots$ — no addition involved.
SeriesThe sum of a sequence's terms. A series converges or diverges; a sequence converges or diverges. They are different objects with different answers.
Partial sum $S_N$The finite sum of the first $N$ terms. The sequence of partial sums is what is tested for a limit.
ConvergesThe partial sums approach a finite value $L$, and $L$ is called the sum.
DivergesThe partial sums fail to approach any finite value — they may grow without bound or oscillate.
Telescoping seriesOne whose partial sums collapse because interior terms cancel, leaving a short expression whose limit can be read directly.
| Series | Terms $a_n\to$ | Partial sums | Verdict |
|---|
| $\displaystyle\sum\frac{1}{2^{n}}$ | $0$ | $\to1$ | converges to $1$ |
| $\displaystyle\sum\frac{1}{n}$ | $0$ | grow without bound | diverges |
| $\displaystyle\sum(-1)^{n}$ | does not exist | oscillate $-1,0,-1,\dots$ | diverges |
| $\displaystyle\sum n$ | $\infty$ | $\to\infty$ | diverges |
| $\displaystyle\sum\left(\frac1n-\frac1{n+1}\right)$ | $0$ | $1-\frac{1}{N+1}\to1$ | converges to $1$ |
Rows 1 and 2 are the pair worth staring at. Both have terms going to zero, and only one converges — which is why ‘the terms shrink’ can never be the end of an argument.
what the definition buys you
- A series is the limit of its partial sums. That definition answers every conceptual question in this unit.
- $a_n\to0$ is necessary but not sufficient for convergence.
- A sequence and its series can behave differently: $a_n=\dfrac1n$ converges to $0$ while $\sum\dfrac1n$ diverges.
- Telescoping and geometric are the only two families whose exact sums you are expected to produce.
Reading the notation
$a_n$one term
$S_N$a finite sum of the first $N$
$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n$the limit of the $S_N$
Worked examples
EX 1
Convergence from the partial sums
a telescoping seriesDetermine whether $\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(\dfrac1n-\dfrac{1}{n+1}\right)$ converges, and find its sum.
1
Write out a partial sum
$S_N=\left(1-\tfrac12\right)+\left(\tfrac12-\tfrac13\right)+\cdots+\left(\tfrac1N-\tfrac1{N+1}\right)$.
2
Cancel the interior
Every negative term is killed by the next positive one, leaving $S_N=1-\dfrac{1}{N+1}$.
3
Take the limit
$\displaystyle\lim_{N\to\infty}\left(1-\dfrac{1}{N+1}\right)=1$.
4
State the conclusion
The series converges, with sum $1$.
5
Note the method
The exact sum was available only because the partial sums collapsed to a short formula. That is rare, and it is the whole reason telescoping is worth spotting.
EX 2
Terms to zero, series diverges
the harmonic seriesExplain why $\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\dfrac1n$ diverges even though $\dfrac1n\to0$.
1
Group the terms
$1+\tfrac12+\left(\tfrac13+\tfrac14\right)+\left(\tfrac15+\cdots+\tfrac18\right)+\cdots$
2
Bound each group below
$\tfrac13+\tfrac14\gt\tfrac14+\tfrac14=\tfrac12$, and the next group also exceeds $\tfrac12$, and so on.
3
Add up the bounds
Each block contributes more than $\tfrac12$, and there are infinitely many blocks.
4
Conclude
$S_N$ grows without bound, so the series diverges.
5
Draw the lesson
The terms shrink, but not fast enough. Convergence is about the rate at which terms shrink, never about the fact that they do.
EX 3
Oscillating partial sums
no limit at allDetermine whether $\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}$ converges.
1
List the partial sums
$S_1=-1$, $S_2=0$, $S_3=-1$, $S_4=0,\dots$
2
Look for a limit
The sequence alternates between $-1$ and $0$ forever.
3
Apply the definition
A limit must be a single value. This sequence has none.
4
Conclude
The series diverges.
5
Note the second reason
The terms themselves do not approach zero, which is already enough to force divergence — two independent arguments for the same verdict.
EX 4
Sequence versus series
two different questionsFor $a_n=\dfrac{n}{n+1}$, discuss the convergence of the sequence and of the series.
1
Test the sequence
$\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}\dfrac{n}{n+1}=1$, so the sequence converges to $1$.
2
Test the series
The terms approach $1$, not $0$.
3
Apply the necessary condition
For a series to converge its terms must go to zero. These do not.
4
Conclude
The series diverges, even though the sequence converges.
5
Fix the distinction
‘Does $a_n$ converge?’ and ‘does $\sum a_n$ converge?’ are separate questions with separate answers. Read which one is being asked.
Boundary cases
Terms going to zero proves nothing
$\sum\dfrac1n$ has terms tending to $0$ and still diverges. The condition is necessary, not sufficient.
The sum is a limit, not an infinite addition
Every partial sum is finite. Convergence means those finite numbers settle down, which is what makes the notion well defined.
A sequence and its series are different objects
$a_n\to L$ describes the terms; $\sum a_n$ describes their running total. Only $L=0$ leaves any hope for the series.
Exact sums are rare
Outside geometric and telescoping series, expect to determine whether a series converges, not what it converges to.