Cutting ticket · claim: the repair treats the boots as a record to keep, not an error to correct
Candidate A
The ticket reads: soles worn through, uppers cracked, all eyelets tarnished.
Left on the cloth. True, quotable, and inert. It inventories condition — which a repair log could state about any pair of boots. Nothing in it can distinguish record from error, so the paragraph would carry a fact and call it proof.
Candidate B
He re-sets the old brass eyelets — all fourteen — with the new steel sitting open on the bench.
Cut. A chosen act, not a condition. The new steel was in reach; the sentence makes the refusal visible. Eyelets are a decision about what the boots are allowed to keep — which is the claim’s exact seam.